What’s in a Name? More Than You Think!
In a move that has sparked debate, former US President Donald Trump has proposed renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, at least within the United States. The idea aligns with his nationalist approach to rebranding places to reflect American influence, but it has also raised concerns over historical accuracy and international relations. While such renaming efforts might appear symbolic, they hold significant geopolitical weight and can reshape global discourse around territorial claims and identity.
The renaming of the Gulf of Mexico is not an isolated event. Throughout history, nations and communities have changed place names for various reasons: political, linguistic, cultural, or strategic. Some changes are widely accepted, while others ignite long-standing disputes.

Names hold power, history, and identity. Yet, many places worldwide are known by more than one name, often due to historical transitions, political decisions, linguistic variations, or colonial pasts. While some dual names exist harmoniously, others fuel debates and diplomatic tensions. Official records often mandate one name, but cultural memory and common usage may keep older names alive.
Official vs. Common names: The policy angle
Governments often standardise names through official gazettes or legal rulings. For example, Mumbai is the official name of India’s financial capital, yet many still call it Bombay. The city was officially renamed in 1995 to reflect Marathi heritage, but ‘Bombay’ persists in brand names, nostalgic references, and cultural discussions. Similarly, Myanmar was officially chosen over Burma in 1989, though many governments and institutions still use the older name.

India’s cities with multiple names
India, with its vast history and linguistic diversity, has numerous places with dual or multiple names. Some are colonial remnants, while others reflect regional languages and political changes.
Place Name (Current Official) | Previous / Alternative Names | Reason for Change |
---|---|---|
Mumbai | Bombay, Bambai | Renamed in 1995 to reflect Marathi heritage |
Kolkata | Calcutta | Changed in 2001 for linguistic accuracy |
Bengaluru | Bangalore | Renamed in 2014 to align with Kannada pronunciation |
Chennai | Madras | Changed in 1996 to honour Tamil identity |
Prayagraj | Allahabad | Reverted to ancient name in 2018 |
Thiruvananthapuram | Trivandrum | Restored its full Malayalam form |
Puducherry | Pondicherry | French colonial name replaced in 2006 |
Varanasi | Banaras, Kashi | Retains its ancient spiritual names |

Beyond India: Global cities and regions with multiple names
From European capitals to disputed territories, the world is full of places with conflicting or dual names.
Place Name (Current Official) | Previous / Alternative Names | Region / Country |
Istanbul | Constantinople | Turkey |
Beijing | Peking | China |
Myanmar | Burma | Southeast Asia |
Côte d’Ivoire | Ivory Coast | West Africa |
Denali | Mount McKinley | USA |
Sea of Japan | East Sea | Japan / South Korea Conflict |
Persian Gulf | Arabian Gulf | Middle East Conflict |
Taiwan | Republic of China (ROC) | East Asia |
Political renaming: China’s attempt to redefine Indian territories

One of the most contentious renaming attempts in recent times has been China’s decision to rename several Indian locations in Arunachal Pradesh in its official records. China refers to the state as ‘Zangnan’ and has renamed towns and landmarks, despite strong objections from India. This is part of a larger strategy to assert territorial claims and redefine international boundaries through nomenclature.
The power of names: More than just words
While some name changes reflect linguistic or cultural evolution, others are driven by political motives. Whether it’s Mumbai vs. Bombay, Myanmar vs. Burma, or China’s renaming of Arunachal Pradesh, the battle over place names is deeply tied to history, identity, and sovereignty.
You may like to read this as well: Google Maps Renames Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America for US Users