We often hear people say that turning 18 means becoming an adult. You can vote, sign documents and take important decisions about your own life. Yet when it comes to relationships, the rules suddenly change. This confusion sits right at the centre of the ongoing debate on the Marriageable Age in India, and honestly, it affects more young people than we realise.
By law, both men and women become adults at 18. They gain full legal identity. They can work, move, study and make financial decisions. But marriage tells a different story. Men cannot marry before 21, while women can marry at 18. This gap between adulthood and marriage laws creates a social grey zone that many young couples find impossible to navigate.
Parents, society and even authorities often treat romantic relationships as invalid unless there is a marriage certificate. But how can a person be trusted to make every life decision except choosing who they want to live with?
The conflict between love and legality
Even if two consenting adults want to live together without marrying, their choice often hits a wall of judgement. Social pressure becomes intense. Sometimes families threaten them, and in extreme situations, violence is reported. Courts across India have repeatedly stated that live-in relationships are not illegal. They are protected under the right to life and personal liberty. Yet the stigma is stronger than the law.
Interestingly, the issue is not about marriage alone. The real question is whether adulthood gives a person the right to choose their partner. Many young couples face difficulty not because they are unsafe, but because their relationship does not match cultural expectations.
India is changing fast. People marry later than before. Education and careers keep young adults away from early marriage. Many prefer to test compatibility before committing legally. Live-in relationships are becoming common in cities, and slowly entering small towns too. Society is evolving, but laws and traditions are still pulling in different directions.
The Marriageable Age in India debate is not simply about numbers. It reveals deeper questions about trust, autonomy and equality. If the law recognises someone as an adult at 18, shouldn’t their emotional decisions also be respected? And if marriage laws are meant to protect individuals from exploitation, shouldn’t they evolve with modern behaviour?
Women and the law: protections that sometimes limit
The legal age difference between men and women was originally meant to protect young girls from early marriage. However, today it often becomes a tool of control. When a young woman wants to live independently or be in a relationship of her choice, families sometimes weaponise the law to stop her. What was meant to protect her sometimes restricts her.
Raising the marriage age for women to 21 has been discussed many times. Supporters say it ensures equality. Critics argue that the focus should be on freedom, not delays. Whatever the final legal decision, one thing is clear. Without understanding young people and their realities, laws alone cannot shape society.
Relationships built on choice and respect do not weaken society. They strengthen it. When adults feel trusted to make personal decisions, they are more likely to create stable families. Approval should not be forced through pressure or fear. It should come from acceptance.
Indian courts will continue clarifying rights. Lawmakers will continue debating reforms. But between the courtrooms and the parliament halls are millions of young adults simply hoping their personal choices will not be treated like crimes.
Maybe the real challenge for our society is not accepting love. It is accepting adulthood.
Subscribe Deshwale on YouTube
