Why India’s Ambitions for the 21st Century Are Entangled in a Monetary System It Did Not Build, and What It Must Do to Break Free
Special Report | Strategic Affairs | 11-minute read
Picture this: March 2022, a Tuesday morning. Trading desks at Mumbai’s state-run refineries are in turmoil. Russian crude, purchased legally, with no Indian law broken, suddenly cannot be paid for. Not because Delhi made a decision. Because every bank, insurer, and payment channel runs through the US dollar. Washington pulled a lever, and the tremors reached Mumbai within 48 hours.
That moment crystallised what Indian policymakers had long known but rarely said aloud: India’s financial sovereignty has a ceiling. All that GDP growth, all that diplomatic heft, all that technological ambition, and yet the country operates inside a monetary system built by others, for purposes that do not always serve Indian interests.
This is not a story about America. It is a story about structural dependence and what a genuinely rising power must do about it.
BY THE NUMBERS
58% — The dollar’s share of global foreign reserves, 2024
85% — India’s dependence on crude oil imports
4th — India’s current GDP rank; third is the 2030 target
18+ — Countries in active rupee-settlement talks with India
HOW THE DOLLAR BECAME THE WORLD’S LANDLORD
To understand the trap, one must first understand how completely the dollar is wired into global commerce. The story does not truly begin at Bretton Woods in 1944. It begins in the decade that followed, when American banks, commodity markets, and military guarantees fused into something unprecedented: a private currency performing a public, global function.
Richard Nixon severed the gold link in 1971. The dollar, rather than weakening, tightened its grip. The mechanism was the petrodollar arrangement of 1973-74, in which Gulf producers agreed to price and settle oil exclusively in dollars while America provided security guarantees in return. A self-reinforcing cycle took hold. Countries needed dollars to buy oil. They accumulated dollars. They recycled those dollars into US Treasury bonds, deepening American capital markets and making the dollar yet more indispensable. The cycle repeated, decade after decade.
Economists Barry Eichengreen and Eswar Prasad have described this as America’s exorbitant privilege, the ability to borrow cheaply from the world simply by printing the currency the world cannot function without. And increasingly, Washington has turned that privilege into a weapon.
“The dollar is our currency, but it’s your problem.” — John Connally, US Treasury Secretary, 1971. More prophetic than he intended.
THE THREE PILLARS OF DOLLAR CONTROL
The Petrodollar System
More than 80% of global oil contracts are denominated in dollars. Since energy underpins every economy, nations must hold dollar reserves simply to keep their industries running. India spent $157 billion importing crude in 2022-23. Nearly all of it in dollars.
SWIFT and Correspondent Banking
SWIFT routes roughly 40 million financial messages every day. Technically a Belgian cooperative, it functions under substantial American regulatory influence. When Iran and Russia were cut off, the economic consequences were swift and severe. India’s major international transactions flow through this same architecture.
Western Control of Financial Infrastructure
Lloyd’s of London dominates global shipping insurance. The CME Group sets commodity benchmarks. New York and London clearinghouses settle trillions in derivatives every day. Even India’s domestic commodity trades are partly benchmarked against Western exchange prices. The plumbing of global finance is Western-owned.
Consider what this means on the ground. When India buys steel from South Korea, the transaction likely clears through a US correspondent bank, is priced against a London or Chicago benchmark, and is insured by a British underwriter. Three Western touchpoints in a trade between two Asian nations that has nothing intrinsically to do with America. This is not coincidence. It is architecture.
WHEN THE SANCTION BECOMES THE WEAPON
America has been reaching for the sanctions lever with increasing frequency since 2001. The Office of Foreign Assets Control now administers more than 30 active sanctions programmes. Between 2000 and 2021, US sanctions designations grew by over 900%. The 2022 freezing of approximately $300 billion in Russian sovereign reserves, accumulated over decades, was perhaps the most dramatic demonstration of dollar power in modern history. As economist Larry Summers observed, it was the financial equivalent of a nuclear option.
That message landed simultaneously in Beijing, Riyadh, New Delhi, and Brasília.
India’s 2022 predicament was its own variant of the same problem. Long-standing defence ties with Russia, a $5.4 billion S-400 missile system acquisition, and a genuine macroeconomic need for discounted Russian crude to contain domestic inflation meant India was not going to join Western sanctions. But actually executing that policy required improvisation: payments routed through UAE dirhams, yuan settlement attempts, and ad hoc bilateral arrangements patched together month by month. Not a crisis, but a revealing demonstration of where the system’s choke points lie.
THE HIDDEN DAILY COST
The geopolitical drama commands the headlines. The real burden is quieter, constant, and enormous.
When the US Federal Reserve raises interest rates, as it did aggressively through 2022 and 2023, capital flows out of emerging markets toward dollar assets. The rupee comes under pressure. Import bills swell. The Reserve Bank of India must either burn foreign exchange reserves to defend the currency or accept higher inflation. Indian monetary policy operates in the shadow of decisions made in Washington with zero reference to Indian conditions.
Economists call it the “impossible trinity”: a country cannot simultaneously maintain monetary autonomy, manage its exchange rate, and allow free capital flows when the dollar anchors the global system. One variable always yields, and for emerging economies, it is invariably monetary autonomy.
The three months following the Fed’s first rate hike in March 2022 saw the rupee depreciate by approximately 5% against the dollar. The consequences were immediate: higher costs for crude oil, fertilisers, electronics, and capital goods, all denominated in dollars, all imported, all more expensive the moment the rupee weakens. India had no role in the original decision.
THE DEBATE, BOTH SIDES, HONESTLY
The case for reducing dollar dependence
Dollar dependence is strategic exposure, not merely inconvenience. Sanctions can reach any country. Federal Reserve spillovers impose real costs on economies that have no democratic voice in the decisions that cause them. A genuinely multipolar world requires multipolar financial architecture. India’s economic weight demands infrastructure commensurate with its ambitions.
The case for scepticism
Dollar dominance is not solely a political construct. It reflects real advantages accumulated over 80 years: deep liquidity, institutional trust, and network effects that no alternative currently matches. The yuan is not freely convertible. Meaningful rupee internationalisation requires a current account surplus that India does not presently run. Moving away from dollar-denominated financing could raise India’s cost of capital precisely when it needs it lowest. The hard economics deserve respect, not dismissal.
Both positions contain genuine truth. The question is one of sequencing, not ideology.
HOW RESERVE CURRENCIES ACTUALLY END
The sceptics are right that monetary orders are durable. But they do end, slowly at first, then with surprising speed.
In the 1870s through the 1910s, sterling commanded roughly 60% of global reserves, and the Bank of England set de facto global monetary conditions. Two world wars and the Great Depression eroded British financial capacity while America became the world’s largest creditor. Dollar usage expanded quietly, without announcement, through the 1920s and 1930s. Bretton Woods in 1944 did not create dollar primacy. It codified a transition that had been underway for thirty years. Britain had no single moment of defeat. The order simply shifted around it.
The contemporary data is instructive. The dollar’s share of global reserves has fallen from approximately 72% in 2001 to 58% in 2024. This is not collapse. But it is the longest sustained decline of the post-war era, and parallel settlement systems are quietly emerging across multiple regions.
The central lesson of monetary history is this: the country that loses reserve currency status rarely chooses to. It is overtaken by shifting economic weight, eroding credibility, and the patient accumulation of alternatives, and recognises the transition only when it is too late to shape it. India cannot force a dollar transition. But it can position itself carefully on the right side of one.
WHAT IS REAL AND WHAT IS NOISE
The de-dollarisation conversation has run significantly ahead of reality in several important respects.
The yuan, for all of China’s ambitions, remains non-freely convertible. Its share of global SWIFT payments stands at approximately 4.6%, genuine growth, but not remotely comparable in scale to the dollar. The proposed BRICS common currency is essentially a recurring summit talking point with no actual technical architecture behind it.
India’s rupee internationalisation programme, launched formally in 2022, is making genuine progress. The RBI has signed rupee trade agreements with 22 countries; Vostro accounts are operational with Russia, Sri Lanka, and the UAE. But a structural constraint remains. India runs a current account deficit. For the rupee to function meaningfully as a trade currency, the countries accumulating rupees must have somewhere to deploy them, which requires India to either export significantly more or open its capital markets further. Both involve real trade-offs that honest policymakers must confront.
The accurate assessment: de-dollarisation is real, gradual, and significant, but not imminent. India’s objective is not to lead an impossible revolution. It is to build resilience against a system it cannot yet exit.
THE POLICY AGENDA
Diversify energy settlement, urgently
Rupee-dirham and rupee-yuan frameworks specifically designed for oil purchases need to accelerate. The UAE relationship is the most promising near-term opportunity. Dubai already functions as a major settlement hub for Indian trade. A formalised energy settlement mechanism with Gulf partners could realistically insulate 20-30% of India’s import costs from dollar exposure within three years.
Build India’s own clearing infrastructure
The RBI’s proposed cross-border payment settlement system, analogous to China’s CIPS platform, requires serious investment and genuine urgency. India’s demographic scale and trading weight cannot be leveraged without financial plumbing it actually controls. This is not expenditure. It is the physical infrastructure of sovereignty.
Lead the Global South on payment corridors
India’s Unified Payments Interface is genuinely world-class, a quiet but substantial achievement. Extending it to Southeast Asian and African markets, as pilot programmes in Singapore and Mauritius have demonstrated is feasible, creates rupee-denominated corridors running on infrastructure India built. The first-mover advantage in this space is available and should be seized.
Deepen domestic capital markets
Rupee internationalisation requires foreign investors to want rupee-denominated assets. That demands bond markets with depth, liquidity, and transparent regulation. India’s government securities market remains partially closed to foreign participation. Sequenced, carefully managed liberalisation with appropriate capital flow safeguards would expand rupee demand without inviting the destabilising hot money flows that have damaged other emerging economies.
Convert G20 momentum into institutional reform
India’s 2023 G20 presidency delivered real achievements on digital public infrastructure. That diplomatic capital should now be directed toward substantive IMF quota reform, expanded Special Drawing Rights allocations for emerging economies, and governance structures that give nations like India genuine decision-making authority rather than symbolic representation.
THE COSTS INDIA MUST HONESTLY ACKNOWLEDGE
Any serious case for reducing dollar dependence must reckon honestly with the costs. Ignoring them is not analysis; it is advocacy.
First: reducing dollar dependence may raise borrowing costs. Dollar-denominated debt typically carries a liquidity premium that makes it cheaper than rupee-equivalent financing. Shifting to local currency borrowing for infrastructure and trade could increase India’s cost of capital precisely when large-scale manufacturing investment requires it to be lowest.
Second: a more internationally held rupee means greater exposure to external demand shocks. Managing that volatility requires deeper foreign exchange reserves, more sophisticated monetary instruments, and stronger financial regulation, capabilities India is developing but has not yet fully built.
Third, and this is the one that is rarely stated plainly, moving away from Western financial infrastructure risks straining relationships with partners whose investment, technology, and strategic cooperation India genuinely needs. De-dollarisation that appears to align India with a China-Russia geopolitical bloc would damage the very partnerships India requires to balance Chinese influence in its own region. The geopolitical optics are inseparable from the economics.
The strategic case for building financial resilience is sound. The execution must be careful, calibrated, and free of ideological performance.
THE REAL OBJECTIVE
The central question for Indian statecraft over the next decade is not whether to challenge the dollar; that ambition is beyond any single country’s capacity. The question is whether India can build genuine optionality: payment systems, currency arrangements, and capital markets deep enough to give India real choices when the dollar system becomes coercive, inconvenient, or simply misaligned with Indian interests.
The British pound did not collapse in a single event. It was gradually made optional by an America that spent decades building the credibility, liquidity, and institutions to offer a genuine alternative. India cannot replicate that trajectory. But the underlying strategic logic is identical.
A country that can settle its energy purchases in rupees, clear its trade through infrastructure it controls, and hold its reserves in genuinely diversified assets has not escaped the dollar system. It has acquired the ability to survive the system’s disruptions and to exercise independent judgment when that system is weaponised.
In an era where finance has become an instrument of statecraft, that capacity is not a luxury reserved for great powers.
It is the very foundation of sovereignty itself.
Data sources: Dollar reserve share from IMF COFER, Q4 2024. India crude oil import dependence from Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, 2023-24. SWIFT yuan share from SWIFT RMB Tracker, January 2025. Sanctions growth data from Gibson Dunn Annual Sanctions Review, 2022. Rupee trade agreements from Reserve Bank of India, February 2025.
Subscribe Deshwale on YouTube
