Walk into any supermarket or browse an online grocery platform today, and one trend is impossible to miss, premium ghee. Once a simple kitchen staple, ghee has been transformed into a luxury product through labels such as “A2”, “Bilona”, “Gir Cow”, “Vedic”, and “Handcrafted”. Packed in earthy-toned jars with images of indigenous cows and traditional churning methods, these products often cost two or even three times more than regular ghee.
For many consumers, the higher price signals better quality and greater health benefits. But does the science behind these claims match the marketing, or has branding moved ahead of the evidence?
The science behind A2
The foundation of the A2 claim lies in a milk protein called beta-casein. Milk contains different proteins, and beta-casein exists mainly in two variants, A1 and A2. These classifications apply specifically to milk proteins, with indigenous cow breeds often associated with producing A2 beta-casein.
However, the process of making ghee raises an important scientific question.
Ghee is prepared by converting milk into cream, cream into butter, and then heating the butter until the water evaporates and milk solids separate. The final product is almost entirely milk fat.
Since the protein that defines A1 and A2 is largely removed during this clarification process, scientists and regulators have questioned what exactly remains in the finished ghee to justify prominently marketing it as “A2 Ghee.”
There is also an important distinction between saying a product is made from A2 milk and calling the finished product A2 Ghee. The first describes the source of the milk, while the second can lead consumers to believe the ghee itself has scientifically established A2 properties. Consumer protection laws generally require that labels should not create misleading impressions.
Premium labels and consumer perception
Another term commonly seen on premium ghee jars is Bilona. Traditionally, Bilona refers to a method in which curd not cream is churned to obtain butter before preparing ghee. The process is labor-intensive, produces lower yields and can genuinely increase production costs.
However, not every product labelled Bilona necessarily follows traditional village-scale production. Manufacturing methods, sourcing practices and quality standards may differ considerably between brands, making transparency essential.
Behavioural economists have long observed that consumers often associate higher prices with better quality. A ₹700 jar of ghee may seem ordinary, while a ₹2,000 jar featuring earthy packaging, Sanskrit-inspired branding and words such as “heritage”, “Vedic” and “A2” creates an image of exclusivity.
In some cases, the premium reflects better sourcing and traditional production. In others, branding itself may account for much of the perceived value. Without clear information, consumers have little way of knowing the difference.
What science and consumers should focus on
Research on A1 and A2 milk has continued for years. Some studies suggest A2 milk may be easier to digest for certain individuals, while others have found little or no significant difference. Overall, there is no broad scientific consensus that A2 milk is inherently superior for the general population.
More importantly, these studies relate to milk, where beta-casein proteins are present, not clarified butterfat like ghee. Applying conclusions about milk directly to ghee remains scientifically uncertain.
Yet most buyers rarely ask whether claims have been independently verified, whether they apply to the milk or the finished product, or whether there is peer-reviewed evidence supporting any implied health benefits. Instead, trust is often placed in attractive packaging and premium branding.
The debate surrounding A2 Ghee follows a familiar pattern seen with terms like “natural”, “chemical-free”, “detox”, “superfood” and “immunity booster”, where marketing popularity often arrives before regulatory clarity.
The bottom line
Questioning marketing claims is not an attack on manufacturers producing high-quality products. Businesses investing in better animal care, traditional methods, improved hygiene and strict quality control have every reason to support clearer standards and greater transparency.
As India’s premium ghee market continues to grow, consumers should understand whether they are paying more for the breed of cow, the production method, independently verified quality or simply an effective marketing story.
Before paying a substantial premium, consumers should ask a few simple questions. Is the higher price based on the breed of cow, the manufacturing method, or both? Does the manufacturer clearly explain what “A2” means in the context of ghee? Are recognized quality certifications disclosed? Is there traceability for the milk being used? And does the label make health claims, or is it merely describing how the product was made?
These questions do not require scientific expertise. They simply require curiosity and a willingness to look beyond the packaging.
There is nothing wrong with premium products or commercial success. However, when scientific terminology becomes a selling point, consumers deserve evidence that matches the claims. Attractive labels and persuasive storytelling should not replace transparency.
A premium price should buy more than a premium story. It should buy a product whose claims can withstand scientific and regulatory scrutiny.
To be continued in part-3
Subscribe Deshwale on YouTube
