“Every great novel is born twice first in the imagination of its author, and then in the imagination of its readers.”
The Adventures of Hajji Baba of Ispahan owes its existence to a peculiar mix of diplomacy, travel and imperial politics.
Its author was not a professional novelist. He was a diplomat.
That may explain why the book still provokes debate two centuries after it first appeared.
The man behind Hajji Baba
James Justinian Morier was born around 1780 in Smyrna, then part of the Ottoman Empire, to a family already tied to trade and diplomacy.
Unlike many armchair writers of his age, Morier had actually travelled through Persia. He joined British diplomatic missions to the Qajar court, first in 1808 and again from 1810 to 1816, eventually serving as Britain’s representative there.
He crossed deserts, visited bazaars, and observed royal ceremonies. He met merchants, officials and ordinary townspeople, filling notebooks with details that later became the raw material for fiction.
When The Adventures of Hajji Baba of Ispahan appeared in London in 1824, readers felt they were entering a world described by someone who had genuinely seen it. That sense of authenticity made the novel an instant success.
Adventure wrapped around observation
One reason Hajji Baba still reads well today is that Morier understood something simple. Facts alone rarely hold a reader’s attention. Stories do.
Instead of writing a dry travelogue, he turned his observations into the misadventures of one unforgettable rogue. Markets became scenes of intrigue. Caravan journeys became suspense. Royal courts became theatres of ambition.
Readers learned about Persia almost without realising they were being educated. That remains one of the novel’s real achievements.
But whose persia was it?
Here lies the central controversy. Morier undoubtedly knew Persia. But did he understand Persians?
Many modern historians read the novel as an example of what later scholars would call Orientalism a way of portraying Eastern societies as exotic, irrational and fundamentally different from Europe.
The criticism isn’t that Morier invented everything. It’s that he took certain traits and exaggerated them until they seemed to define an entire civilisation.
The result was a vivid story. It was not necessarily a balanced portrait.
Why persians were offended
Imagine reading a famous foreign novel where your country is repeatedly shown as dishonest and morally weak. Even if parts of it rang true, you would likely object to the generalisation.
That was the reaction of many Iranian intellectuals to Hajji Baba. They admired Morier’s storytelling and his eye for detail. But they rejected the idea that Hajji Baba represented the “typical Persian.”
The book became one of the earliest literary battlegrounds over national identity and representation.
The translation that changed everything
One of the most striking twists in this story came decades later. Around 1886, while living in exile in Ottoman Turkey, the Persian writer and grammarian Mirza Habib Isfahani translated the novel into Persian.
He did not simply convert English words into Persian. He reshaped the language, sharpened the humour, and softened some of the original’s harsher edges to suit Persian sensibilities.
Scholars widely regard his version as a masterpiece of Persian prose in its own right, one that arguably outshines the English original. It went on to be printed repeatedly in Calcutta, Lahore and Tehran, and remains a landmark in the development of the modern Persian novel.
Gujarat’s window to the world
In twentieth-century India, translations of world classics played a real role in expanding readers’ horizons. Gujarati publishers introduced generations of readers to Jules Verne, Alexandre Dumas, Victor Hugo and Tolstoy.
Hajji Baba found a natural place alongside them. For Gujarati readers, the novel was less about imperial politics and more about storytelling.
Children marvelled at the hero’s clever escapes. Adults appreciated the satire. Everyone enjoyed the humour, much like readers of Arabian Nights before them.
A hero unlike any other
Most fictional heroes win through courage. Hajji Baba survives through intelligence.
He lies, bargains, improvises, and changes professions as easily as changing clothes. By conventional moral standards, he is deeply flawed. Yet he remains oddly likeable.
Why? Because readers recognise something universal in him. Life rarely rewards perfection. It often rewards adaptability.
Every defeat becomes another beginning for Hajji Baba. Every humiliation becomes another lesson. That quality gives the novel its lasting energy.
Reading Hajji Baba today
A modern reader should approach the novel with two minds. The first delights in the adventure. The second asks questions.
What assumptions shaped the author’s view? Which descriptions reflect careful observation, and which reflect nineteenth-century prejudice?
Reading this way does not diminish the novel. It enriches it. The best classics are the ones that invite admiration and argument at the same time.
Literature does not have to be perfect to be great. Sometimes its imperfections are exactly what make it historically significant.
The Adventures of Hajji Baba of Ispahan is an exhilarating adventure novel. It is also a document of its age.
Its pages hold laughter, suspense, wit and unforgettable characters. They also hold the assumptions of an empire looking eastward.
To read Hajji Baba today is to encounter both. And that is why, two centuries after its publication, this wandering barber’s son from Isfahan still provokes debate wherever serious readers gather.
Subscribe Deshwale on YouTube
